header-logo header-logo

Equity—Subrogation—Unjust enrichment

30 September 2010
Issue: 7435 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Anfield (UK) Ltd v Bank of Scotland plc [2010] EWHC 2374 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) (Sept)

Chancery Division, Proudman J, 24 Sept 2010

A lender who stipulates for a legal charge but who in fact obtains only an equitable charge due to his failure to register under the Land Registration Acts will, subject to fulfilment of all other relevant requirements, be entitled to be subrogated to an earlier legal charge that was discharged with his advance.

Richard Lander (instructed by Chandler Harris) for the claimant. Charlotte Eborall (instructed by Optima Legal Services Limited) for the first defendant.
The proceedings arose out of loans to the second defendant, a bankrupt, who was the registered proprietor of property in London (the property). The claimant was A Ltd and the first defendant was Bank of Scotland plc (the bank).

The bank advanced money to the second defendant to redeem a charge of 30 June 2000 in respect of the Halifax building society (the Halifax charge) and in September 2006 received in return an executed charge (the 2006 charge) capable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll