header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
17 April 2015
Issue: 7648 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

EU

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and another company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) T-378/13, [2015] All ER (D) 276 (Mar)

The Court of Justice of the European Union allowed the action brought by Apple and Pear Australia Ltd (Apple and Pear) and another company against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) relating to opposition proceedings between Apple and Pear and Carolus C. BVBA (Carolus) concerning the application by Carolus for registration of the word sign “English pink” as a Community trade mark.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Speechlive LogoClick to know more
Haynes Boone—Louise Woods

Haynes Boone—Louise Woods

Haynes Boone expands global capabilities with addition of Louise Woods as chair of international disputes

DWF—John Gilfedder

DWF—John Gilfedder

DWF strengthens Global Risks practice with strategic hire of aviation partner in London

Shakespeare Martineau—10 newly qualified solicitors

Shakespeare Martineau—10 newly qualified solicitors

Shakespeare Martineau appoints newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: The cost of uncertainty
When does a solicitor’s retainer become a contentious business agreement? The Court of Appeal’s decision in Broadfield Law UK LLP v Barnes shows that listing hourly rates alone will not do, leaving firms and clients uncertain about their rights over bills
NLJ this week: Parliament’s curious exit
MPs cannot simply resign their Commons seats. Instead, they take a nominal Crown office, usually the Chiltern Hundreds or Manor of Northstead, which disqualifies them from sitting
NLJ this week: Family ties count
A divorced woman has secured funding to participate in her former husband’s inquest after the Legal Aid Agency reconsidered repeated refusals
NLJ this week: Thirlwall inquiry’s unfinished business
The Thirlwall Inquiry has exposed a ‘complete failure’ to protect babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital, but its recommendations must now be put into practice
NLJ this week: Planning’s direct route
Developers in areas with poorly performing councils can apply directly to the Planning Inspectorate for permission under section 62A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll