header-logo header-logo

24 June 2016
Issue: 7704 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

EU

European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland C-308/14 , [2016] All ER (D) 68 (Jun)

The Court of Justice of the European Union refused the European Commission’s request for a declaration that by the requirement that a claimant for child benefit or child tax credit had to have a right to reside in the United Kingdom, that member state had failed to comply with its obligations under art 4 of European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) 883/2004. It rejected the contention that that requirement had added a condition to the applicable test and found that, while indirectly discriminatory, it was justified and proportionate.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll