header-logo header-logo

22 July 2016
Issue: 7708 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

EU

Amoena (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2016] UKSC 41, [2016] All ER (D) 56 (Jul)

The Supreme Court, in allowing the taxpayer’s appeal in part, held, among other things, that, on a natural reading, a mastectomy bra imported by the taxpayer, designed to be worn with a silicone breast form by women who had undergone surgical removal of one or both breasts, was an “accessory”, which, by holding the breast form in place, enabled it to perform its function. The bra, therefore performed a particular service relative to the main function of the breast form and fell within the classification of “parts and accessories” in note 2(b) to Ch 90 of heading 9021 of the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union, such that it did not attract the payment of customs duty.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Kevin Moore

Browne Jacobson—Kevin Moore

Browne Jacobson strengthens All-Island life sciences platform with appointment of leading Galway MedTech lawyer

Clarke Willmott—Latitude Law

Clarke Willmott—Latitude Law

National law firm strengthens commercial offering with acquisition of leading immigration practice

Flint Bishop—Charlotte Harris

Flint Bishop—Charlotte Harris

Sheffield expansion continues with appointment of commercial property partner

NEWS
Mr Justice Nicklin’s decision to order costs on an indemnity basis may be a ‘significant win’ but it’s still ‘far from game, set and match’ for Associated Newspapers, a former costs judge has said
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll