header-logo header-logo

22 March 2013
Issue: 7553 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

EU—Broadcasting

ITV Broadcasting Ltd and other companies v TVCatchup Ltd C-607/11, [2013] All ER (D) 116 (Mar)

The concept of “communication to the public”, within the meaning of Art 3(1) of Directive (EC) 2001/29 of the European Parliament and of the Council (on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society), should be interpreted as meaning that it covered a retransmission of the works included in a terrestrial television broadcast—where the retransmission is made by an organisation other than the original broadcaster—by means of an internet stream made available to the subscribers of that other organisation who might receive that retransmission by logging on to its server—even though those subscribers were within the area of reception of that terrestrial television broadcast and might lawfully receive the broadcast on a television receiver. It was not irrelevant that a “communication” within the meaning of Art 3(1) of the Directive was of a profit-making nature. However, a profit-making nature was not necessarily an essential condition for the existence of a communication to the public. Consequently, a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll