header-logo header-logo

EU—Broadcasting

22 March 2013
Issue: 7553 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

ITV Broadcasting Ltd and other companies v TVCatchup Ltd C-607/11, [2013] All ER (D) 116 (Mar)

The concept of “communication to the public”, within the meaning of Art 3(1) of Directive (EC) 2001/29 of the European Parliament and of the Council (on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society), should be interpreted as meaning that it covered a retransmission of the works included in a terrestrial television broadcast—where the retransmission is made by an organisation other than the original broadcaster—by means of an internet stream made available to the subscribers of that other organisation who might receive that retransmission by logging on to its server—even though those subscribers were within the area of reception of that terrestrial television broadcast and might lawfully receive the broadcast on a television receiver. It was not irrelevant that a “communication” within the meaning of Art 3(1) of the Directive was of a profit-making nature. However, a profit-making nature was not necessarily an essential condition for the existence of a communication to the public. Consequently, a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll