header-logo header-logo

09 May 2014
Issue: 7605 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

EU—Employment

Lyreco Belgium NV v Rogiers C-588/12, [2014] All ER (D) 32 (May)

On the true construction of cl 2.4 of the framework agreement on parental leave, set out in the annex to Council Directive (EC) 96/34 (on the framework agreement on parental leave concluded by the European Union Trade Confederation, the Union of Industrial and Employers’ Confederations of Europe and the European Centre of Employers and Enterprises) (the Framework Agreement), which was set out in the annex to the Directive, read in the light both of the objectives of that Framework Agreement and of cl 2.6 thereof, it was contrary to that provision for the fixed-sum protective award payable to a worker on a part-time parental leave, where the employer unilaterally and without compelling or sufficient reason terminated that worker’s full-time contract of indefinite duration, to be determined on the basis of the reduced salary earned by that worker at the date of the dismissal. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll