header-logo header-logo

EU—Regulations—Legal basis of regulation

04 October 2013
Issue: 7578 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

European Commission and another v Kadi C-584/10 P, C-593/10 P and C-595/10 P, [2013] All ER (D) 411 (Jul)

Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber), Judges Skouris (President), Lenaerts (Rapporteur and Vice-President), Ilesic, Bay Larsen, von Danwitz and Berger (Presidents of Chambers), Lohmus, Levits, Arabadjiev, Toader, Kasel, Safjan and Svaby, 18 July 2013

The Court of Justice of the European Union dismissed appeals brought by the European Commission and others which sought to set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 30 September 2010, by which that Court had annulled Commission Regulation (EC) 1190/2008 of 28 November 2008 amending regulations imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against Osama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network and the Taliban, in so far as that measure concerned the respondent, Mr Kadi. 

K had been identified as an individual associated with Osama bin Laden and the Al-Qaeda network. In October 2001, he was listed on the Sanctions Committee Consolidated List. His name was subsequently added

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll