header-logo header-logo

EU—Regulations—Legal basis of regulation

04 October 2013
Issue: 7578 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

European Commission and another v Kadi C-584/10 P, C-593/10 P and C-595/10 P, [2013] All ER (D) 411 (Jul)

Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber), Judges Skouris (President), Lenaerts (Rapporteur and Vice-President), Ilesic, Bay Larsen, von Danwitz and Berger (Presidents of Chambers), Lohmus, Levits, Arabadjiev, Toader, Kasel, Safjan and Svaby, 18 July 2013

The Court of Justice of the European Union dismissed appeals brought by the European Commission and others which sought to set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 30 September 2010, by which that Court had annulled Commission Regulation (EC) 1190/2008 of 28 November 2008 amending regulations imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against Osama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network and the Taliban, in so far as that measure concerned the respondent, Mr Kadi. 

K had been identified as an individual associated with Osama bin Laden and the Al-Qaeda network. In October 2001, he was listed on the Sanctions Committee Consolidated List. His name was subsequently added

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll