header-logo header-logo

04 October 2013
Issue: 7578 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

EU—Regulations—Legal basis of regulation

European Commission and another v Kadi C-584/10 P, C-593/10 P and C-595/10 P, [2013] All ER (D) 411 (Jul)

Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber), Judges Skouris (President), Lenaerts (Rapporteur and Vice-President), Ilesic, Bay Larsen, von Danwitz and Berger (Presidents of Chambers), Lohmus, Levits, Arabadjiev, Toader, Kasel, Safjan and Svaby, 18 July 2013

The Court of Justice of the European Union dismissed appeals brought by the European Commission and others which sought to set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 30 September 2010, by which that Court had annulled Commission Regulation (EC) 1190/2008 of 28 November 2008 amending regulations imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against Osama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network and the Taliban, in so far as that measure concerned the respondent, Mr Kadi. 

K had been identified as an individual associated with Osama bin Laden and the Al-Qaeda network. In October 2001, he was listed on the Sanctions Committee Consolidated List. His name was subsequently added

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll