header-logo header-logo

European lawyers to lose practise rights

15 October 2018
Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

About 700 registered European lawyers (RELs) would lose the right to practise in December 2020, under a ‘no deal’ Brexit.

Moreover, no new REL applications could be made from 11pm on the day of exit, 29 March 2019.  

RELs and EU lawyers seeking to practise in England and Wales would therefore have to requalify as a solicitor or barrister or become Registered Foreign Lawyers.

Last week the government published its latest technical notice on leaving the EU, ‘Providing services including those of a qualified professional if there’s no Brexit deal’.

The regime for regulating registered European lawyers (RELs) will end, subject to a transitional period lasting to the end of December 2020. Under the regime, RELs register with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and can provide the full range of legal services, including working as a sole practitioner.

The SRA has written to all RELS, explaining how they will be affected. Applications received but still being processed on exit day will be honoured, and applicants allowed to practise until December 2020.

It said RELs will be able to qualify as a solicitor in England and Wales through the Qualifying Lawyer Transfer Scheme (QLTS), the new Solicitors Qualifying Examination, due to be introduced at the earliest in autumn 2020. Exemptions to parts of the exam may be given to take account of qualifications and experience.

The technical notice also sets out the removal of the Directive that covers mutual recognition of professional qualifications. The SRA said a future system for recognition of professional qualifications will be developed in the event of no deal.

Christina Blacklaws, president of the Law Society, said firms would incur ‘a significant amount of expense’ to find ways around the issue.

The government’s notice also provided no answers for UK lawyers in the EU, who could face different barriers in each of the 30 EU/EEA countries, she said.

‘That’s why we continue to call on the government to put mutual market access at the heart of its Brexit priorities. Legal services are one of Britain’s greatest exports—it’s worth almost £30bn annually to the UK economy and one of its key requirements is to be able to recruit talent internationally and support businesses in the UK and EU.’

Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll