header-logo header-logo

23 October 2008
Issue: 7342 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Exclusive jurisdiction clauses

Janna Purdie considers exclusive jurisdiction clauses: the separability of such clauses and the consequences of an invalid contract

 

Exclusive jurisdiction clauses

In a judgment extending the court's powers under exclusive jurisdiction clauses, the Court of Appeal held that courts hearing contractual claims, made pursuant to an exclusive jurisdiction clause, may in the event that the contract is invalid also determine any alternative claims brought as a consequence of a finding that the contract is invalid.

Facts of the case

The claimant banks brought proceedings for repayment of monies under a credit agreement. The claimants asserted that the credit agreement contained a valid jurisdiction clause which complied with Art 23 of the Judgments Regulation 44/2001 (The Judgments Regulation) such that it should be regarded as an exclusive jurisdiction clause.

The defendants asserted that the credit agreement was void for want of authority.

The banks accordingly applied for permission to amend their claim to bring alternative claims in restitution and/or misrepresentation (the new claims) in the event that the credit agreement was found to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll