header-logo header-logo

Exclusive jurisdiction clauses

23 October 2008
Issue: 7342 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Janna Purdie considers exclusive jurisdiction clauses: the separability of such clauses and the consequences of an invalid contract

 

Exclusive jurisdiction clauses

In a judgment extending the court's powers under exclusive jurisdiction clauses, the Court of Appeal held that courts hearing contractual claims, made pursuant to an exclusive jurisdiction clause, may in the event that the contract is invalid also determine any alternative claims brought as a consequence of a finding that the contract is invalid.

Facts of the case

The claimant banks brought proceedings for repayment of monies under a credit agreement. The claimants asserted that the credit agreement contained a valid jurisdiction clause which complied with Art 23 of the Judgments Regulation 44/2001 (The Judgments Regulation) such that it should be regarded as an exclusive jurisdiction clause.

The defendants asserted that the credit agreement was void for want of authority.

The banks accordingly applied for permission to amend their claim to bring alternative claims in restitution and/or misrepresentation (the new claims) in the event that the credit agreement was found to be void.

Mr

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll