header-logo header-logo

03 March 2017 / James Watthey
Issue: 7736 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Exclusive jurisdiction: a war on two fronts?

nlj_7736_watthey

When is an exclusive jurisdiction clause not an exclusive jurisdiction clause, asks James Watthey

  • Where a bank has executed against security in a foreign jurisdiction under local “self help” remedies, can it also sue in London?

In Bank of Baroda and Bank of India v Nawany Marine Shipping & others [2016] EWHC 3089 (Comm), [2016] All ER (D) 28 (Dec), the Commercial Court determined a jurisdictional battle which revolved around an important point of principle for the international finance community: where a bank has executed against security in a foreign jurisdiction under local “self help” remedies, can it also sue in London?

At least on these facts and with this jurisdiction clause, the answer was in the affirmative.

The jurisdiction clause

The parties entered into a typical suite of loan and guarantee documents in April 2008, for the purpose of financing the purchase of the vessel “DEVIGLORY I”. A facility agreement and personal guarantees contained the sort of jurisdiction clauses, highly favourable to the banks, that finance lawyers are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll