header-logo header-logo

Expect the unexpected?

13 February 2015 / Fred Philpott
Issue: 7640 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
philpott

When is a non-regulated credit agreement regulated asks Fred Philpott

Since the introduction of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (the Act) one of the major classifications has been between agreements regulated by the Act and those which are non-regulated. In very general terms, agreements which are non-regulated are not subject to the Act (although there are exceptions). A credit agreement entered into with an individual (as defined) as borrower will be regulated unless it is (i) an exempt agreement, or (ii) before 6 April 2008, above the monetary limit. The original monetary limit was £5,000 which was increased to £15,000 and finally to £25,000. Similar rules apply to hire agreements. Credit and hire agreements with bodies corporate are and were always non-regulated.

Consequence

A major consequence of an agreement being regulated is that it has to comply with documentary requirements and, in particular, be drafted in accordance with the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553) or 2010 (SI 2010/1014). For example, the heading must state that it is a regulated agreement and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll