header-logo header-logo

Expect the unexpected?

13 February 2015 / Fred Philpott
Issue: 7640 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
philpott

When is a non-regulated credit agreement regulated asks Fred Philpott

Since the introduction of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (the Act) one of the major classifications has been between agreements regulated by the Act and those which are non-regulated. In very general terms, agreements which are non-regulated are not subject to the Act (although there are exceptions). A credit agreement entered into with an individual (as defined) as borrower will be regulated unless it is (i) an exempt agreement, or (ii) before 6 April 2008, above the monetary limit. The original monetary limit was £5,000 which was increased to £15,000 and finally to £25,000. Similar rules apply to hire agreements. Credit and hire agreements with bodies corporate are and were always non-regulated.

Consequence

A major consequence of an agreement being regulated is that it has to comply with documentary requirements and, in particular, be drafted in accordance with the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553) or 2010 (SI 2010/1014). For example, the heading must state that it is a regulated agreement and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll