header-logo header-logo

Expect the unexpected?

13 February 2015 / Fred Philpott
Issue: 7640 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
philpott

When is a non-regulated credit agreement regulated asks Fred Philpott

Since the introduction of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (the Act) one of the major classifications has been between agreements regulated by the Act and those which are non-regulated. In very general terms, agreements which are non-regulated are not subject to the Act (although there are exceptions). A credit agreement entered into with an individual (as defined) as borrower will be regulated unless it is (i) an exempt agreement, or (ii) before 6 April 2008, above the monetary limit. The original monetary limit was £5,000 which was increased to £15,000 and finally to £25,000. Similar rules apply to hire agreements. Credit and hire agreements with bodies corporate are and were always non-regulated.

Consequence

A major consequence of an agreement being regulated is that it has to comply with documentary requirements and, in particular, be drafted in accordance with the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553) or 2010 (SI 2010/1014). For example, the heading must state that it is a regulated agreement and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—Tim Foley

Winckworth Sherwood—Tim Foley

Property litigation practice strengthened by partner hire

Kingsley Napley—Romilly Holland

Kingsley Napley—Romilly Holland

International arbitration team specialist joins the team

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
back-to-top-scroll