header-logo header-logo

13 February 2015 / Fred Philpott
Issue: 7640 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Expect the unexpected?

philpott

When is a non-regulated credit agreement regulated asks Fred Philpott

Since the introduction of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (the Act) one of the major classifications has been between agreements regulated by the Act and those which are non-regulated. In very general terms, agreements which are non-regulated are not subject to the Act (although there are exceptions). A credit agreement entered into with an individual (as defined) as borrower will be regulated unless it is (i) an exempt agreement, or (ii) before 6 April 2008, above the monetary limit. The original monetary limit was £5,000 which was increased to £15,000 and finally to £25,000. Similar rules apply to hire agreements. Credit and hire agreements with bodies corporate are and were always non-regulated.

Consequence

A major consequence of an agreement being regulated is that it has to comply with documentary requirements and, in particular, be drafted in accordance with the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553) or 2010 (SI 2010/1014). For example, the heading must state that it is a regulated agreement and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
back-to-top-scroll