header-logo header-logo

13 February 2015 / Fred Philpott
Issue: 7640 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Expect the unexpected?

philpott

When is a non-regulated credit agreement regulated asks Fred Philpott

Since the introduction of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (the Act) one of the major classifications has been between agreements regulated by the Act and those which are non-regulated. In very general terms, agreements which are non-regulated are not subject to the Act (although there are exceptions). A credit agreement entered into with an individual (as defined) as borrower will be regulated unless it is (i) an exempt agreement, or (ii) before 6 April 2008, above the monetary limit. The original monetary limit was £5,000 which was increased to £15,000 and finally to £25,000. Similar rules apply to hire agreements. Credit and hire agreements with bodies corporate are and were always non-regulated.

Consequence

A major consequence of an agreement being regulated is that it has to comply with documentary requirements and, in particular, be drafted in accordance with the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553) or 2010 (SI 2010/1014). For example, the heading must state that it is a regulated agreement and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll