header-logo header-logo

Expert witness availability & trial dates

15 August 2019 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7853 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Chris Pamplin serves up a master class on how to avoid diary clashes in & out of court

  • The Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) 1998 place a duty on the parties to a case to assist the court in the listing of cases for trial, and this would include expert witness availability.

Fixing of trial dates has always been a difficult task. A court has to juggle with numerous variables to ensure that the date fixed complies with the need to deal with cases efficiently and promptly and without incurring unnecessary cost. It must also have regard to the availability of witnesses (including expert witnesses) and allow sufficient time for the parties to properly prepare and carry out any necessary pre-trial steps.

An expert’s instructing solicitor should, of course, obtain from the expert a list of any unavailable dates. If the solicitor does not ask for these, the expert should be proactive in supplying them. It would also be prudent to offer the reasons for unavailability. Naturally, experts must notify

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Employment law team strengthened with partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

Corporate solicitor joins as partner in Birmingham

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Corporate director with expertise in creative industries joins mergers and acquisitions team

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll