header-logo header-logo

Expert witness: Directors’ breaches & consequences

13 August 2021 / Rakesh Kapila
Issue: 7945 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail
54942
Rakesh Kapila considers how forensic accountants can assist lawyers in actions arising from alleged breaches of directors’ responsibilities
  • Examples of breaches and their consequences.
  • Forensic accountants’ role.

Shareholder dissatisfaction at company performance in the UK often focuses on directors’ responsibilities. The Companies Act 2006 codified certain general duties such as the duty to promote the interests of the company and directors’ obligations have also been refined over the years by case law. Certain legislative provisions affecting directors extend to ‘shadow directors’, ie persons on whose instructions the directors of a company are accustomed to act.

This article provides examples of directors’ breaches and their consequences and considers how forensic accountants can assist lawyers in actions arising from alleged breaches of directors’ responsibilities.

Forensic accountants’ role

Forensic accountants may become involved in showing that specific breaches of duty occurred, in putting forward defences to alleged breaches and in the computation of the financial consequences of a breach.

In relation to the financial consequences of a breach of duty,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll