header-logo header-logo

25 October 2007 / B Mahendra
Issue: 7294 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Expert witness update

B Mahendra reports on recent cases

The facts of the extraordinary case of Re W (a child) (non-accidental injury: expert evidence) [2007] EWHC 136(Fam), [2007] All ER (D) 159 (Apr) exposed the failings of both expert evidence and the processes of the family justice system. When the case ended in a resounding mea culpa (proffered) by the law, it was held that the child, now aged three, had never suffered non accidental injury and that its parents could be completely exonerated of any wrongdoing; their care of the child had, been exemplary. To get some sense of the Kafkaesque nightmare suffered by the parents one must read the long and exemplary judgment given by Mr Justice Ryder.

The much simplified facts were that the child, after developing normally for a few weeks after birth, developed symptoms and signs of a localised neurological disorder. The essence of the task of explanation to be given for this disorder was to determine whether or not the brain injury could have been due to natural events occurring at the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll