header-logo header-logo

Expert witnesses

29 January 2010
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Jones v Kaney [2010] EWHC 61 (QB), [2010] All ER (D) 131 (Jan)

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Stanton v Callaghan [1998] 4 All ER 961 remained good law, and was binding on the lower courts. The fact that human rights considerations might question some of the policy assumptions behind a previous decision of a superior court was no basis for concluding that the decision was no longer authoritative.

There was no judgment of the European Court of Human Rights on the issue. A direct challenge to the decision or principle in play would be needed before a court could rely upon the passage of the Human Rights Act 1998, as a sufficient statutory change in the law to revisit a proposition spelt out a binding judgment in a superior court.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll