header-logo header-logo

29 January 2010
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Expert witnesses

Jones v Kaney [2010] EWHC 61 (QB), [2010] All ER (D) 131 (Jan)

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Stanton v Callaghan [1998] 4 All ER 961 remained good law, and was binding on the lower courts. The fact that human rights considerations might question some of the policy assumptions behind a previous decision of a superior court was no basis for concluding that the decision was no longer authoritative.

There was no judgment of the European Court of Human Rights on the issue. A direct challenge to the decision or principle in play would be needed before a court could rely upon the passage of the Human Rights Act 1998, as a sufficient statutory change in the law to revisit a proposition spelt out a binding judgment in a superior court.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
The controversial Mazur ruling, which caused widespread uncertainty about the role of non-solicitors in litigation work, has been overturned on appeal
Two landmark social media cases in the US could influence social media regulation in the UK, lawyers predict
Barristers have urged the government to set up Nightingale-style specialist courts, with jury trials, to prioritise rape, sexual assault and domestic abuse trials
Victims of violent crimes who suffer life-changing injuries receive less than half the financial support today than those in the 1990s, according to a senior personal injury lawyer
Rising numbers of cases, an increase in litigants in person and an overall lack of investment is piling pressure on the family court, the Law Society has warned
back-to-top-scroll