header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Experts boost support for restorative justice

News

Leading criminologists want the government to create a Restorative Justice Board to work closely with the courts in promoting restorative justice (RJ) across the UK.

The board would make RJ programmes available in all areas of the country, set standards and monitor outcomes, and would report to the Department for Constitutional Affairs.

The benefits of RJ are set out in Restorative Justice: The Evidence, a report published this week by the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation and the Smith Institute, which finds that many violent criminals are less likely to commit further offences after participating in an RJ programme.
The report says that crime victims’ post-traumatic stress symptoms are reduced by RJ, and that the number of offences dealt with away from the courts could be doubled.

The research used 36 direct comparisons between RJ and conventional criminal justice, and found that in at least two tests RJ reduced recidivism more than prison; substantially reduced repeat offending for some offenders but not all; reduced the costs of justice when used as diversion from conventional means of justice; and doubled the offences brought to justice as diversion from conventional criminal justice.

Sir Charles Pollard, formerly Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police and chair of the steering group overseeing the research, says: “Offenders often say that RJ is much more challenging than our traditional justice system, and this provides the proof. We now need a properly resourced implementation board...to drive its implementation so that it becomes a normal part of our justice system across the country.”

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll