header-logo header-logo

05 May 2017
Issue: 7744 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Extradition

Norkowski v District Court in Bydoszcz, Poland and others [2017] EWHC 833 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 97 (Apr)

The Administrative Court dismissed the appellant’s appeal against orders for his extradition to Poland on three European Arrest Warrants. There was no suggestion that the judge had not addressed the proper issues when having considered the appellant’s challenge under s 14 of the Extradition Act 2003, concerning oppression, and there was no justifiable basis for interfering with his conclusion in relation to the impact of extradition upon the appellant and his family, pursuant to Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll