header-logo header-logo

11 August 2017
Issue: 7758 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Extradition

Government of Rwanda v Nteziryayo [2017] EWHC 1912 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 203 (Jul)

On the basis of the correct legal test of a real risk of a flagrant denial of justice, there was real risk of a truly serious or flagrant denial of justice occasioned by the respondents’ extradition to Rwanda on various charges arising from the killings in 1994. The Divisional Court held that, in an authoritarian state, where judicial independence was institutionally weak and had been compromised in the past, and there was established fear by witnesses, the existing arrangements for defence were quite insufficient to ensure a reasonable fairness in the proceedings.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll