header-logo header-logo

20 July 2012
Issue: 7523 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Extradition

Stopyra v District Court of Lublin, Poland and another case [2012] EWHC 1787 (Admin), [2012] All ER (D) 104 (Jul)

It was clear that the present system for means testing for legal aid applications in extradition cases produced unacceptable delays that were unjust. The system was in effect unworkable in practice within the time limits set out in the Extradition Act 2003 and the Framework Decision and was inconsistent with overarching principles of fairness and justice in timely decision-making in extradition cases. The current system needed urgent revision to eliminate delays. The UK had to put in place a legal aid system for European arrest warrants which ensured that requested persons had speedy access to legal representation, namely within a timeframe which was (a) compatible with ensuring compliance with the time limits laid down in the Framework Decision in Arts 11 and 17 and (b) consonant with the principles of justice. If steps were not urgently taken by the ministry, then no doubt there would be further appeals or applications for judicial review and the UK would remain

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll