header-logo header-logo

28 April 2023 / Abigail Rushton , Rhys Novak
Issue: 8022 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Criminal , Governance
printer mail-detail

Fail to prevent, prepare to fail

120622
The new ‘failure to prevent’ fraud criminal offence: Abigail Rushton & Rhys Novak set out the steps corporate bodies should be taking now to prepare
  • The government has confirmed a new failure to prevent fraud criminal offence. Large corporate bodies doing business in the UK and those working for it will be caught by the new legislation.
  • Prosecutors will only have to show a lack of reasonable procedures in place to prevent the offences.
  • Large corporate bodies should start preparing now by: assessing and managing risk; reviewing and implementing fraud prevention and detection measures; and confirming their response strategy.

Assuming it makes it onto the statute book, the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill 2022-2023 (the Bill) is set to be one of the biggest changes to laws tackling economic crime in over a decade. Businesses faced with issues of fraud and false accounting would do well to keep an eye on its progress and start planning now for its entry into force.

It

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll