header-logo header-logo

28 April 2023 / Abigail Rushton , Rhys Novak
Issue: 8022 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Criminal , Governance
printer mail-detail

Fail to prevent, prepare to fail

120622
The new ‘failure to prevent’ fraud criminal offence: Abigail Rushton & Rhys Novak set out the steps corporate bodies should be taking now to prepare
  • The government has confirmed a new failure to prevent fraud criminal offence. Large corporate bodies doing business in the UK and those working for it will be caught by the new legislation.
  • Prosecutors will only have to show a lack of reasonable procedures in place to prevent the offences.
  • Large corporate bodies should start preparing now by: assessing and managing risk; reviewing and implementing fraud prevention and detection measures; and confirming their response strategy.

Assuming it makes it onto the statute book, the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill 2022-2023 (the Bill) is set to be one of the biggest changes to laws tackling economic crime in over a decade. Businesses faced with issues of fraud and false accounting would do well to keep an eye on its progress and start planning now for its entry into force.

It

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll