header-logo header-logo

Leases: Falling short?

07 November 2025 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 8138 / Categories: Features , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail
235038
Can a lease be for a matter of days, or even hours? Mark Pawlowski examines the problems associated with short-term lettings
  • While the law permits leases for very short periods—even hours or days—courts frequently interpret them as contractual licences rather than true tenancies.
  • The Renters’ Rights Act 2025 (when brought into force) will make important changes to residential tenancies, while business tenancies under six months fall outside statutory protection..

Subject to the requirement that a lease must be of certain duration, a ‘term of years absolute’ may relate to any length of time. Indeed, s 205(1)(xxvii) of the Law of Property Act 1925 defines the expression as including a ‘term for less than a year, or for a year or years and a fraction of a year or from year to year’. This suggests that, at least in theory, a tenancy may exist for a very short period of time counted in terms of days or even hours.

Tenancy or licence?

There is authority which supports the notion that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Sports disputes practice launchedwith partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

Tax and succession planning offering expands with returning partner

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
back-to-top-scroll