header-logo header-logo

Families facing removal of children have no access to lawyer

30 May 2024
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Family
printer mail-detail
More than a quarter of parties in some areas are unrepresented in public family law cases, which are about removing a child from their parents into local authority care

Figures collected by the Law Society found 30% unrepresented in Medway and Canterbury, 28% unrepresented in Portsmouth (Hampshire and Isle of Wight), 27% unrepresented in North Wales, 26.5% unrepresented in Devon, and 25% unrepresented in South East Wales.

Lizzy Parkes, national helpline manager at Support Through Court, said: ‘The experience of representing oneself in court is overwhelming.

‘Many of the family cases we are seeing at our service are eligible for legal aid but cannot find a legal aid provider with the capacity to take on new cases. At the same time, the majority, if not all, of the cases involve domestic abuse. These cases are emotionally distressing and this is further exacerbated when those involved are forced to represent themselves.

‘There’s a huge increase in mental health problems in the clients approaching our service and mentions of suicidal ideation. Many of our clients also do not have access to technology or regular access to the internet.

‘They are struggling to manage their entire case, prepare documents, submit paperwork and write up witness statements on their phones themselves.’

Liz Fisher-Frank, acting director at Essex Law Clinic, said: ‘Where in the past a solicitor’s letter may have resolved issues or encouraged mediation, now clients seeking to resolve issues, where necessary, must navigate the process of making an application to the court on their own—which can be incredibly daunting and for some simply too much to deal with.’

The Law Society has called on the next government to increase civil legal aid to make the work financially viable, uprate the civil legal aid means test eligibility to widen the pool of people eligible for legal aid, and collect and publish better data on the family justice system.

Law Society president, Nick Emmerson, said: ‘Our members tell us that they see litigants in person (LiPs) who represent themselves feeling overwhelmed with court process, court orders and procedure rules, which leads them to have difficulties.

‘The family courts are in a dire state and the system is plagued with delays. Some strides have been made to improve the family justice system such as an early legal advice pilot and a pledge to introduce a new online information and guidance tool to support earlier resolution of family disputes.

‘There has also been a small improvement in 2024 of the number of cases with representation in private family law. However, much more is needed to make our family law justice system fit for purpose.’

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll