header-logo header-logo

Family

30 November 2012
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Re X and Y (children) (executive summary of serious case review: reporting restrictions) [2012] EWCA Civ 1500, [2012] All ER (D) 213 (Nov)

The statutory regime in Wales governing the restriction of publication of material likely to lead to the identification of children following criminal proceedings in which a parent of the children was convicted of a serious offence relating to one of the children’s siblings comprised the Children Act 2004 and the Local Safeguarding Children Boards (Wales) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1705). That regime recognised the need to balance the various Art 8 and Art 10 rights in play, and indicated that the balance was to be struck by publishing an executive summary appropriately anonymised. The statutory scheme was plainly Convention compliant and carefully crafted to accommodate the Strasbourg “balancing exercise”. In each individual case, careful thought would need to be given to the identities of those who required anonymisation, and the degree of anonymisation required. The statutory scheme contemplated, and compliance with the Convention required, that what was published had to be anonymised to such an extent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Pensions firm welcomes legal director in London

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Real estate disputes team strengthened by London partner hire

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Litigation partner joins disputes team in London

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll