header-logo header-logo

Family

30 November 2012
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Re X and Y (children) (executive summary of serious case review: reporting restrictions) [2012] EWCA Civ 1500, [2012] All ER (D) 213 (Nov)

The statutory regime in Wales governing the restriction of publication of material likely to lead to the identification of children following criminal proceedings in which a parent of the children was convicted of a serious offence relating to one of the children’s siblings comprised the Children Act 2004 and the Local Safeguarding Children Boards (Wales) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1705). That regime recognised the need to balance the various Art 8 and Art 10 rights in play, and indicated that the balance was to be struck by publishing an executive summary appropriately anonymised. The statutory scheme was plainly Convention compliant and carefully crafted to accommodate the Strasbourg “balancing exercise”. In each individual case, careful thought would need to be given to the identities of those who required anonymisation, and the degree of anonymisation required. The statutory scheme contemplated, and compliance with the Convention required, that what was published had to be anonymised to such an extent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll