header-logo header-logo

Family barristers at break point

12 March 2009
Issue: 7360 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Legal services , Profession , Family
printer mail-detail

Pay cuts forcing family barristers to desert legal aid work

Family barristers are struggling with complex caseloads, disruptive patterns of work, and pay cuts, according to a report published last week.

Dr Debora Price and Anne Laybourne of King’s College London examined more than 5,000 cases undertaken by more than 1,600 barristers in one week in October last year for their study, The Work of the Family Bar. The report found a quarter of family barristers earned less than £44,000, and half less than £66,000 a year. Almost all family barristers supplemented their legal aid work with privately paid income. Dr Price said: “The work of the family Bar bears a heavy responsibility—the consequences of failure in advocating a client’s case are severe, and include the risk of children being returned to perpetrators of child abuse, the removal of a child from home and the loss of parental rights, domestic violence and homelessness.
“We found that legal aid pay for family barristers lags far behind private client rates and below the rates paid by local authorities. If further cuts in legal aid rates are imposed then there is evidence that this will spread to cases involving serious child abuse too.”

Desmond Browne QC, chairman of the Bar Council, says: “This compelling report provides hard evidence that government policies are driving skilled advocates out of the family justice system, leaving the most vulnerable in society exposed to miscarriages of family justice. The Bar Council is acutely aware of the deep commitment of family barristers, many of whom are now working to breaking point, as this research shows. It is especially regrettable that barristers are effectively penalised for doing legally aided family work, rather than privately paying work, and that this is hitting women and black and minority ethnic advocates hardest of all.”

The Legal Services Commission announced cuts to the family graduated fee scheme in February, and is proposing further cuts which will see payments cut by up to 55%, according to the Bar Council.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll