header-logo header-logo

Family: Children as applicants

12 March 2009 / Geraldine Morris
Issue: 7360 / Categories: Features , Public , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Geraldine Morris on the isolation of children in family proceedings

Family life is not straightforward, most of all for children whose families live in more than one home who may have siblings or half siblings from multiple relationships.

The 2007 report by the NSPCC Your Shout Too! surveyed children involved in Children Act 1989 proceedings. The children who took part in the survey (in collaboration with the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service) were aged between 11 and 18 and 90% had a sibling or half sibling.

The survey findings highlighted the following:

  •   
    ●     Only 7.5% of the children attended court.
  •   
    ●     Of those who did not attend court, 40% would have liked to and to have had the opportunity to speak to the judge.
  •   
    ●     16% of the children said they did not see a sibling or half sibling who lived elsewhere as often as they would like and that this was a significant source of sadness, anxiety and/or frustration.

There has been significant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll