header-logo header-logo

12 March 2009 / Geraldine Morris
Issue: 7360 / Categories: Features , Public , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Family: Children as applicants

Geraldine Morris on the isolation of children in family proceedings

Family life is not straightforward, most of all for children whose families live in more than one home who may have siblings or half siblings from multiple relationships.

The 2007 report by the NSPCC Your Shout Too! surveyed children involved in Children Act 1989 proceedings. The children who took part in the survey (in collaboration with the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service) were aged between 11 and 18 and 90% had a sibling or half sibling.

The survey findings highlighted the following:

  •   
    ●     Only 7.5% of the children attended court.
  •   
    ●     Of those who did not attend court, 40% would have liked to and to have had the opportunity to speak to the judge.
  •   
    ●     16% of the children said they did not see a sibling or half sibling who lived elsewhere as often as they would like and that this was a significant source of sadness, anxiety and/or frustration.

There has been

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll