header-logo header-logo

Family court backlogs & divvying up the family silver

23 February 2024 / Catherine Doherty Montanaro
Issue: 8060 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail
160019
Despite the 2022 reforms, separating couples may wait years for financial remedy proceedings to be concluded. Catherine Doherty Montanaro considers the implications
  • The backlog in cases means financial remedy proceedings are slow to come to court. But the treatment of income and assets amassed during a period of separation is unclear, as is the issue of deferred consideration.
  • The court is leaning towards including deferred consideration in situ at trial when calculating the matrimonial assets available for division, except those acquired more than 12 months after separation. But each case is different.

Following the April 2022 law reforms, there is now no requirement to wait for any period of time before proceeding with a no-fault divorce and related financial application. However, the backlog of cases slowing down the family courts means that often, the reality is that couples have been separated (emotionally if not also physically) for many months, if not years, by the time their financial remedy application is considered by a judge.

While it is established law that (subject

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll