header-logo header-logo

21 January 2021 / David Burrows
Issue: 7917 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Family fortunes revisited: 2021

36421
David Burrows calls for clarity and fairness for families and practitioners and highlights some priorities for the year ahead

For a couple of years now I have speculated as to what I might do if I ruled the family law world, most recently in NLJ: ‘Family fortunes’, 170 NLJ 7873, p17. Since then, the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 has received royal assent. The Domestic Abuse Bill has passed all legislation stages in the Commons and is making its way through the House of Lords with the committee stages due at the end of the month. Parties will want to know how criminal, civil and family law domestic abuse elements will meld in court processes; and how the new act—when made—will settle down with the existing domestic violence legislation (Family Law Act 1996, Pt 4) which appears to be being retained.

The Family Procedure Rules Committee has set up a ‘working group’ to deal with amendments to the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (SI 2010/2955) (FPR 2010, Pt 7) to deal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll