header-logo header-logo

19 March 2009
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

Family justice inquiry

Family

Child protection lawyers have joined with the NSPCC to call for an urgent Parliamentary inquiry into the state of the family justice system.

A letter fired off to the chairman of the House of Commons Justice Select Committee, Alan Beith MP, this week warns of mounting concern about the impact of repeated cuts in the family justice system.

The letter refers to the report, The Work of the Family Bar by Dr Debora Price and Anne Laybourne of King’s College London, which showed family law barristers were “close to breaking point” (as reported in NLJ, 13 March 2009, p 361).

It adds: “As the Ministry of Justice and the Legal Services Commission prepare to implement further cuts in family legal aid...access to family practitioners, who are best able to represent the interests of vulnerable families and children, is being further constrained.”

 

Issue: 7361 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll