header-logo header-logo

01 September 2020 / Graeme Fraser
Issue: 7900 / Categories: Opinion , Family , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Family justice post COVID-19: the road to recovery

26152
Ingenuity & resilience have helped to ensure justice for many families in lockdown but a coherent recovery plan is essential to protect the most vulnerable, as Graeme Fraser explains

The Sixth Report of the House of Commons Justice Committee of Session 2019-21 published last month (https://bit.ly/346gmjo) provides an honest and balanced appraisal of the courts’ performance during the pandemic, with constructive comment on how to address the backlog of unheard cases. It also raises important questions as to the permanence of the emergency changes and the future of the existing reform programme.

Recommendations by the Justice Committee

HMCTS, the Judiciary and the court staff have been commended for maintaining significant levels of service and delivering successful and rapid changes. This approach will be needed in the longer term to implement the proposed recovery plan. Work is required to identify the impact of increased use of digital technology on case outcomes, the perception of fairness, and any barriers to access to justice. Changes introduced during

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll