header-logo header-logo

Family justice post COVID-19: the road to recovery

01 September 2020 / Graeme Fraser
Issue: 7900 / Categories: Opinion , Family , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
26152
Ingenuity & resilience have helped to ensure justice for many families in lockdown but a coherent recovery plan is essential to protect the most vulnerable, as Graeme Fraser explains

The Sixth Report of the House of Commons Justice Committee of Session 2019-21 published last month (https://bit.ly/346gmjo) provides an honest and balanced appraisal of the courts’ performance during the pandemic, with constructive comment on how to address the backlog of unheard cases. It also raises important questions as to the permanence of the emergency changes and the future of the existing reform programme.

Recommendations by the Justice Committee

HMCTS, the Judiciary and the court staff have been commended for maintaining significant levels of service and delivering successful and rapid changes. This approach will be needed in the longer term to implement the proposed recovery plan. Work is required to identify the impact of increased use of digital technology on case outcomes, the perception of fairness, and any barriers to access to justice. Changes introduced

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll