header-logo header-logo

29 January 2010
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Family justice review

Family mediators have called for every couple in dispute over residence or contact to be compelled to go to pre-mediation assessment meetings on their financial as well as their children’s issues.

Family mediators have called for every couple in dispute over residence or contact to be compelled to go to pre-mediation assessment meetings on their financial as well as their children’s issues.

The Family Mediation Council—which is made up of Resolution, the Law Society and other legal groups which support mediation—was responding to the green paper, Support for All—the Families and Relationships Green Paper, published last week, which proposes a major review of the family justice system. The proposals include compulsory mediation assessment meetings  for parents who seek to go to court to resolve residence or contact disputes. The council wants the government to go further and include parents seeking to resolve financial issues.

Deborah Turner, convenor of the Council, says: “To make consideration of mediation compulsory with regard to residence and contact disputes only, without including finances, imposes an artificial distinction. In reality, the children’s issues and the financial issues are almost always interlinked—particularly where residence is disputed.

A Resolution spokesperson said: “While we welcome a review of family law we do not believe the review is wide ranging enough. We would like it to look at other options like collaborative law and arbitration as well as mediation, as we believe that families should have access to a wide range of options and be able to choose the best option for them.”
 

Issue: 7402 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll