header-logo header-logo

Family justice review

29 January 2010
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Family mediators have called for every couple in dispute over residence or contact to be compelled to go to pre-mediation assessment meetings on their financial as well as their children’s issues.

Family mediators have called for every couple in dispute over residence or contact to be compelled to go to pre-mediation assessment meetings on their financial as well as their children’s issues.

The Family Mediation Council—which is made up of Resolution, the Law Society and other legal groups which support mediation—was responding to the green paper, Support for All—the Families and Relationships Green Paper, published last week, which proposes a major review of the family justice system. The proposals include compulsory mediation assessment meetings  for parents who seek to go to court to resolve residence or contact disputes. The council wants the government to go further and include parents seeking to resolve financial issues.

Deborah Turner, convenor of the Council, says: “To make consideration of mediation compulsory with regard to residence and contact disputes only, without including finances, imposes an artificial distinction. In reality, the children’s issues and the financial issues are almost always interlinked—particularly where residence is disputed.

A Resolution spokesperson said: “While we welcome a review of family law we do not believe the review is wide ranging enough. We would like it to look at other options like collaborative law and arbitration as well as mediation, as we believe that families should have access to a wide range of options and be able to choose the best option for them.”
 

Issue: 7402 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll