header-logo header-logo

Family justice review

29 January 2010
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Family mediators have called for every couple in dispute over residence or contact to be compelled to go to pre-mediation assessment meetings on their financial as well as their children’s issues.

Family mediators have called for every couple in dispute over residence or contact to be compelled to go to pre-mediation assessment meetings on their financial as well as their children’s issues.

The Family Mediation Council—which is made up of Resolution, the Law Society and other legal groups which support mediation—was responding to the green paper, Support for All—the Families and Relationships Green Paper, published last week, which proposes a major review of the family justice system. The proposals include compulsory mediation assessment meetings  for parents who seek to go to court to resolve residence or contact disputes. The council wants the government to go further and include parents seeking to resolve financial issues.

Deborah Turner, convenor of the Council, says: “To make consideration of mediation compulsory with regard to residence and contact disputes only, without including finances, imposes an artificial distinction. In reality, the children’s issues and the financial issues are almost always interlinked—particularly where residence is disputed.

A Resolution spokesperson said: “While we welcome a review of family law we do not believe the review is wide ranging enough. We would like it to look at other options like collaborative law and arbitration as well as mediation, as we believe that families should have access to a wide range of options and be able to choose the best option for them.”
 

Issue: 7402 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll