header-logo header-logo

15 December 2011
Issue: 7494 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Family law

S v C [2011] EWCA Civ 1385, [2011] All ER (D) 26 (Dec)

The decision of the Supreme Court in Re E (children) (wrongful return) [2011] 4 All ER 517 had been a restatement, not an evolution, of the law of the European Convention on Human Rights. The Supreme Court had simply applied the autonomous law of the Convention. It had not been operating in its more usual role of settling the domestic law of the United Kingdom. The judge had therefore erred to the extent he had considered Re E to have effectively introduced a lower standard for the mother advancing a defence under art 13(b) of the Convention.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces promotions at Ludlow office

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints partner in Leeds residential team

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
The Court of Appeal was entitled to uphold the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, according to an analysis of the ruling
back-to-top-scroll