header-logo header-logo

Family law: home of the brave?

07 February 2025 / Rachel Buckley
Issue: 8103 / Categories: Features , Family , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
207182
Creative approaches & daring action can lead to surprisingly positive outcomes for clients, writes Rachel Buckley

As a company, we operate with a core value of ‘brave’—something we believe is relevant to every area of our business as family lawyers. Beyond the law, the essence of resilience and bravery is key to our businesses and client success. It is a fascinating exercise to look at how this concept essentially pervades the daily work of a family law firm, to recognise the many situations where a family lawyer needs to be brave, even when they don’t realise it.

Leaning into difficult conversations

Family lawyers are often required to have difficult conversations with clients, conversations in which the client is resistant or unwilling to accept the facts—for example, managing expectations or ensuring they are not being manipulated. In a divorce, for instance, when emotions are high and there’s plenty of information and questions to process, a spouse can be manipulated or controlled without them realising what is happening.

In this situation,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Firm grows London practice with two partner promotions

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Government contracts and procurement practice expands with London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll