header-logo header-logo

Family law: home of the brave?

07 February 2025 / Rachel Buckley
Issue: 8103 / Categories: Features , Family , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
207182
Creative approaches & daring action can lead to surprisingly positive outcomes for clients, writes Rachel Buckley

As a company, we operate with a core value of ‘brave’—something we believe is relevant to every area of our business as family lawyers. Beyond the law, the essence of resilience and bravery is key to our businesses and client success. It is a fascinating exercise to look at how this concept essentially pervades the daily work of a family law firm, to recognise the many situations where a family lawyer needs to be brave, even when they don’t realise it.

Leaning into difficult conversations

Family lawyers are often required to have difficult conversations with clients, conversations in which the client is resistant or unwilling to accept the facts—for example, managing expectations or ensuring they are not being manipulated. In a divorce, for instance, when emotions are high and there’s plenty of information and questions to process, a spouse can be manipulated or controlled without them realising what is happening.

In this situation,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll