header-logo header-logo

04 September 2008 / David Barry
Issue: 7335 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Family law update

Jurisdiction and the balance of fairness. David Barry discusses the implications of Bush & Bush

In Bush & Bush [2008] EWCA Civ 865, [2008] All ER (D) 320 (Jul) the parents married in London in 1988. They subsequently lived abroad but all three of their children (aged between 14 years and nine years) were born in England and held British citizenship. The children were never resident in England.

In September 2006 the family went to live in Spain. By February 2007 the parties separated. The eldest child lived with the father and subsequently the middle child also lived with him. In July 2007 the mother filed a divorce petition in England based on the parties' domicile.

The mother filed a statement of arrangements. On 31 July 2007 the father filed an acknowledgment of service and also filed his own statement of arrangements. It was agreed the parties and the children were all habitually resident in Spain. Born 3 August 2007 the father filed an application in the Court of First Instance, Marbella (the Spanish

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll