header-logo header-logo

04 September 2008 / David Barry
Issue: 7335 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Family law update

Jurisdiction and the balance of fairness. David Barry discusses the implications of Bush & Bush

In Bush & Bush [2008] EWCA Civ 865, [2008] All ER (D) 320 (Jul) the parents married in London in 1988. They subsequently lived abroad but all three of their children (aged between 14 years and nine years) were born in England and held British citizenship. The children were never resident in England.

In September 2006 the family went to live in Spain. By February 2007 the parties separated. The eldest child lived with the father and subsequently the middle child also lived with him. In July 2007 the mother filed a divorce petition in England based on the parties' domicile.

The mother filed a statement of arrangements. On 31 July 2007 the father filed an acknowledgment of service and also filed his own statement of arrangements. It was agreed the parties and the children were all habitually resident in Spain. Born 3 August 2007 the father filed an application in the Court of First Instance, Marbella (the Spanish

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll