header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007 / Diane Watanabe
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Family Law Update

PARENTAL CHILD ABDUCTION
RE D (A CHILD) (ABDUCTION: RIGHTS OF CUSTODY)

THE CHILD’S WELFARE

When dealing with the resolution of disputes over children the child’s welfare must be the court’s paramount consideration under s 1(1) of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989). Section 1(3) provides a welfare checklist to which the court must have regard whenever it is considering a s 8, ChA 1989 order. Of particular relevance is s 1(3)(a), ChA 1989, which stipulates that the court must have regard to the “ascertainable wishes and feelings of the child concerned (in the light of his age and understanding)”.

Consequently, where children are thought to be sufficiently mature, the court must give due weight to their views in a s 8, ChA 1989 application. Historically this approach has been rather different to the approach adopted in cases governed by the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980 (the Hague Convention). What, therefore, is the approach adopted by the Hague Convention?
 

THE REVISED BRUSSELS II

The Revised Brussels II Regulation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll