header-logo header-logo

Family legal aid set to suffer?

02 September 2010
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Family
printer mail-detail

Fears as substantial number of family firms fail bidding round

Solicitor’s firms are licking their wounds after receiving the results of the family legal aid bid round, with lawyers warnings of advice deserts and widespread redundancies.

A survey by family law group Resolution of 561 firms revealed that 40% have been wholly unsuccessful in their competitive tendering bids to provide family legal aid, while 15% were only partially successful. The firms said they expect to have to make up to 542 redundancies.

The survey results suggest people in need of help could in the future fail to find a legal adviser. Family lawyers expressed concerns that domestic abuse victims in need of emergency legal aid and those in need of specialist legal advice on issues such as forced marriage could struggle to find help.

Practitioners warned of emerging “advice deserts” in Dorset, Cornwall, Bedfordshire and Lincolnshire. Cornwall now has only five family legal aid providers operating from 11 offices in the county.

David Allison, chair of Resolution, said: “Our survey has painted a very worrying picture for the future of legal aid provision in England and Wales.
“We have pressed the Legal Services Commission for a full picture of the contracts awarded but this will not be published until the appeals process ends. Our survey tells us that 86% of those who were unsuccessful will be appealing and it is clear that the complete picture is unlikely to emerge until very shortly before the contracts start on 14 October.”

He added: “There are signs already of movement in the market, with mergers, acquisitions and movement of staff, but it remains to be seen whether the market can fully adjust quickly enough.

“While we knew that competitive tendering was coming, delays in the award of contracts has left firms little time to open new offices, make people redundant or plan recruitments.”

Resolution has called on the government for an urgent statement of the practical steps they will take to remedy the shortfall.
 

Issue: 7431 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll