header-logo header-logo

Family maintenance: subject to review?

09 June 2023 / Stephen Gerlis
Issue: 8028 / Categories: Opinion , Family , Divorce , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail
125554
Recent years have shown how quickly fortunes can change: Stephen Gerlis makes the case for regular reviews of maintenance payments in private family law

In March 2023, Lord Bellamy, a government justice minister, announced that he had asked the Law Commission to examine whether the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) needed updating. The main complaint was about asset-splitting and the wide discretion afforded to the courts when making such awards, which can cause uncertainty. On 4 April, the Law Commission announced a review of the law governing financial remedies on divorce and dissolution. It will consider whether the current law works effectively and delivers ‘fair and consistent’ outcomes for separating couples.

I propose joining the long queue of legal commentators at the door of the Law Commission, but my suggestion is rather niche and covers an area which ought to be obvious but is often overlooked—maintenance. Before there is a collective groan, may I make it clear that there is one particular aspect of maintenance that bothers me.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll