header-logo header-logo

09 June 2023 / Stephen Gerlis
Issue: 8028 / Categories: Opinion , Family , Divorce , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail

Family maintenance: subject to review?

125554
Recent years have shown how quickly fortunes can change: Stephen Gerlis makes the case for regular reviews of maintenance payments in private family law

In March 2023, Lord Bellamy, a government justice minister, announced that he had asked the Law Commission to examine whether the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) needed updating. The main complaint was about asset-splitting and the wide discretion afforded to the courts when making such awards, which can cause uncertainty. On 4 April, the Law Commission announced a review of the law governing financial remedies on divorce and dissolution. It will consider whether the current law works effectively and delivers ‘fair and consistent’ outcomes for separating couples.

I propose joining the long queue of legal commentators at the door of the Law Commission, but my suggestion is rather niche and covers an area which ought to be obvious but is often overlooked—maintenance. Before there is a collective groan, may I make it clear that there is one particular aspect of maintenance that bothers me.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll