header-logo header-logo

09 June 2023 / Stephen Gerlis
Issue: 8028 / Categories: Opinion , Family , Divorce , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail

Family maintenance: subject to review?

125554
Recent years have shown how quickly fortunes can change: Stephen Gerlis makes the case for regular reviews of maintenance payments in private family law

In March 2023, Lord Bellamy, a government justice minister, announced that he had asked the Law Commission to examine whether the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) needed updating. The main complaint was about asset-splitting and the wide discretion afforded to the courts when making such awards, which can cause uncertainty. On 4 April, the Law Commission announced a review of the law governing financial remedies on divorce and dissolution. It will consider whether the current law works effectively and delivers ‘fair and consistent’ outcomes for separating couples.

I propose joining the long queue of legal commentators at the door of the Law Commission, but my suggestion is rather niche and covers an area which ought to be obvious but is often overlooked—maintenance. Before there is a collective groan, may I make it clear that there is one particular aspect of maintenance that bothers me.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll