header-logo header-logo

13 June 2012
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Family Procedure (Amendment) (No 2) Rules 2012 (SI 2012/1462)

The Family Procedure Rules 2010, SI 2010/2955, r 31.17 currently provide that a registered order cannot be enforced until the time limit for appeals has expired.

Commencement date
1 July 2012

Legislation Affected

SI 2010/2955 amended


Summary

Legislative Background

The time limit for appeals is set at one or two months (two months if the person bringing the appeal is habitually resident outside the UK).

What’s Changing?

The Rules amend the Family Procedure Rules 2010, SI 2010/2955, r 31.17.

They give the court a discretion to permit urgent enforcement where necessary to secure a child’s welfare notwithstanding the general position that enforcement is suspended pending expiry of relevant appeal periods.

The amendment is necessary in order to comply with the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Health Service Executive v SC and AC, Attorney General intervening (case no

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll