header-logo header-logo

08 April 2016
Issue: 7693 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Family proceedings

Estrada v Al-Juffali (Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs intervening) [2016] EWCA Civ 176, [2016] All ER (D) 197 (Mar)

The Court of Appeal dismissed a husband’s appeal against the refusal of his application to strike out his wife’s claim for financial relief. The court found that the judge had erred in finding that the husband was not entitled, in principle, to immunity due to his appointment as a Permanent Representative to the International Maritime Organisation, but upheld the judge’s conclusion that the husband was permanently resident in the UK and that, in those circumstances, he was not entitled to immunity from as it applied only to claims in respect of official acts performed in the exercise of his functions.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—William Hallett & Lorna Scully

Anthony Collins—William Hallett & Lorna Scully

Anthony Collins hires two talented legal directors

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

NEWS
A High Court ruling has sent a jolt through the legal profession after a newly qualified solicitor used an internal AI tool to produce court correspondence containing a fabricated legal citation
A significant data privacy ruling has clarified what counts as valid consent under UK data protection law
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
back-to-top-scroll