header-logo header-logo

03 June 2016
Issue: 7701 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Family proceedings

Re Z (A child) (No 2) [2016] EWHC 1191 (Fam), [2016] All ER (D) 153 (May)

The Family Division made an order, based on a concession by all the parties that ss 54(1) and (2) of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 were incompatible with the rights of the applicant father and the second respondent surrogate child under Art 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights taken in conjunction with Art 8 of the Convention, insofar as they prevented the applicant from obtaining a parental order on the sole ground of his status as a single person as opposed to being part of a couple.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

EIP—Stuart Malcolm

EIP—Stuart Malcolm

EIP strengthens Commercial practice with a new partner

Ellisons—Francesca Brown

Ellisons—Francesca Brown

Ellisons welcomes Francesca Brown to Family team

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau strengthens Sheffield regulatory practice with new hires

NEWS
A wide-ranging Civil Way column highlights developments from insolvency procedure to employment law, but one case stands out for its lessons on bankruptcy, family homes and digital communications
A sprawling Intellectual Property Office battle between House of Fraser and Frasers Property has delivered a masterclass in modern trade mark law
Courts in England and Wales and Singapore are increasingly confronting complex disputes over international child relocation as families become more globally mobile
The government’s long-awaited family law reform consultation could mark a turning point for domestic abuse victims navigating financial remedy proceedings, but significant challenges remain
A new commercial court pilot giving the public access to documents used in hearings, including expert reports, is raising difficult questions about transparency and privacy
back-to-top-scroll