A Local Authority v Mother and another [2017] All ER (D) 81 (Sep), [2017] Lexis Citation 291
From the options available in respect of a five-month-old girl, G, the only option that was in her interests was adoptive placement. The Family Court held that it was overwhelmingly clear that, if G were to be returned to her mother, the mother would not be able to care for her adequately even at the most basic level.
Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating
West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire
Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire
The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ
