header-logo header-logo

17 June 2016 / Giselle Davies , Giselle Davies
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Features , Charities
printer mail-detail

A fatal flaw?

nlj_7703_davies

Is it goodbye to freedom of testamentary disposition, ask Giselle Davies & Bethan Walsh

  • The aftermath of Ilott v Mitson and impact on charities.

The Court of Appeal’s judgment in the case of Ilott v Mitson [2015] EWCA Civ 797, [2016] 1 All ER 932, received widespread press coverage and sparked debate about leaving money to charity to the detriment of family members. Mrs Heather Ilott was estranged from her mother, Mrs Melita Jackson, following Ilott’s elopement with her now husband, almost 40 years before Jackson’s death. Jackson left her entire £500,000 estate to three charities and nothing to Ilott. Following a legal battle lasting several years, and in spite of her mother making it clear that she did not wish her daughter to inherit anything, Ilott was eventually awarded £164,000. The Court of Appeal (CofA) found that Jackson had acted in an “unreasonable, capricious and harsh” manner towards her daughter and Ilott’s personal hardship and family history led the CofA to award her £164,000.

Although the CofA handed down its judgment last year,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll