header-logo header-logo

A fatal flaw?

17 June 2016 / Giselle Davies , Giselle Davies
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Features , Charities
printer mail-detail
nlj_7703_davies

Is it goodbye to freedom of testamentary disposition, ask Giselle Davies & Bethan Walsh

  • The aftermath of Ilott v Mitson and impact on charities.

The Court of Appeal’s judgment in the case of Ilott v Mitson [2015] EWCA Civ 797, [2016] 1 All ER 932, received widespread press coverage and sparked debate about leaving money to charity to the detriment of family members. Mrs Heather Ilott was estranged from her mother, Mrs Melita Jackson, following Ilott’s elopement with her now husband, almost 40 years before Jackson’s death. Jackson left her entire £500,000 estate to three charities and nothing to Ilott. Following a legal battle lasting several years, and in spite of her mother making it clear that she did not wish her daughter to inherit anything, Ilott was eventually awarded £164,000. The Court of Appeal (CofA) found that Jackson had acted in an “unreasonable, capricious and harsh” manner towards her daughter and Ilott’s personal hardship and family history led the CofA to award her £164,000.

Although the CofA handed down its judgment last year,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll