header-logo header-logo

Fears that video tax hearings could be ‘temperamental’

22 February 2018
Issue: 7782 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Taxpayers should exercise caution before taking part in a video tax appeal pilot, a leading solicitor has warned.

Court hearings conducted entirely via video are to be piloted this spring, starting with tax appeals. HMCTS wrote to potential parties last week, inviting them to take part.

The video hearings would take place over the internet, with each participant logging in from a location of their choice using a webcam and, for the purposes of the pilot, the judge located in the courtroom. The format and process of the hearing would be the same as in a physical courtroom, and the judge would have discretion over whether or not to use a video hearing. HMCTS said it is working closely with the judiciary to ‘ensure the majesty of a physical courtroom will be upheld’.

However, Pinsent Masons tax partner Steven Porter, who regularly handles tax disputes including complex and group litigation, said: ‘The government’s video hearing pilot is undoubtedly a step towards the future, but will surely suffer a series of teething pains in ensuring the service works as it should.

‘The current video conferencing facilities of the tribunals/courts are extremely temperamental. Taxpayers with a hearing longer than a few hours should be cautious of joining the pilot, particularly if they are to give evidence.

‘Often in longer hearings the judge gains a lot from interaction with witnesses, and taxpayers wouldn’t want the judge’s opportunity to interact or to make assessments of the witnesses to be diminished. That said, for the right cases this is undeniably a step in the right direction.’

Justice minister Lucy Frazer, said: ‘We are spending £1bn on transforming and modernising the justice system. Video hearings have the potential to improve access to justice and speed up cases.’

Issue: 7782 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll