header-logo header-logo

22 February 2018
Issue: 7782 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Fears that video tax hearings could be ‘temperamental’

Taxpayers should exercise caution before taking part in a video tax appeal pilot, a leading solicitor has warned.

Court hearings conducted entirely via video are to be piloted this spring, starting with tax appeals. HMCTS wrote to potential parties last week, inviting them to take part.

The video hearings would take place over the internet, with each participant logging in from a location of their choice using a webcam and, for the purposes of the pilot, the judge located in the courtroom. The format and process of the hearing would be the same as in a physical courtroom, and the judge would have discretion over whether or not to use a video hearing. HMCTS said it is working closely with the judiciary to ‘ensure the majesty of a physical courtroom will be upheld’.

However, Pinsent Masons tax partner Steven Porter, who regularly handles tax disputes including complex and group litigation, said: ‘The government’s video hearing pilot is undoubtedly a step towards the future, but will surely suffer a series of teething pains in ensuring the service works as it should.

‘The current video conferencing facilities of the tribunals/courts are extremely temperamental. Taxpayers with a hearing longer than a few hours should be cautious of joining the pilot, particularly if they are to give evidence.

‘Often in longer hearings the judge gains a lot from interaction with witnesses, and taxpayers wouldn’t want the judge’s opportunity to interact or to make assessments of the witnesses to be diminished. That said, for the right cases this is undeniably a step in the right direction.’

Justice minister Lucy Frazer, said: ‘We are spending £1bn on transforming and modernising the justice system. Video hearings have the potential to improve access to justice and speed up cases.’

Issue: 7782 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll