header-logo header-logo

22 February 2018
Issue: 7782 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Fears that video tax hearings could be ‘temperamental’

Taxpayers should exercise caution before taking part in a video tax appeal pilot, a leading solicitor has warned.

Court hearings conducted entirely via video are to be piloted this spring, starting with tax appeals. HMCTS wrote to potential parties last week, inviting them to take part.

The video hearings would take place over the internet, with each participant logging in from a location of their choice using a webcam and, for the purposes of the pilot, the judge located in the courtroom. The format and process of the hearing would be the same as in a physical courtroom, and the judge would have discretion over whether or not to use a video hearing. HMCTS said it is working closely with the judiciary to ‘ensure the majesty of a physical courtroom will be upheld’.

However, Pinsent Masons tax partner Steven Porter, who regularly handles tax disputes including complex and group litigation, said: ‘The government’s video hearing pilot is undoubtedly a step towards the future, but will surely suffer a series of teething pains in ensuring the service works as it should.

‘The current video conferencing facilities of the tribunals/courts are extremely temperamental. Taxpayers with a hearing longer than a few hours should be cautious of joining the pilot, particularly if they are to give evidence.

‘Often in longer hearings the judge gains a lot from interaction with witnesses, and taxpayers wouldn’t want the judge’s opportunity to interact or to make assessments of the witnesses to be diminished. That said, for the right cases this is undeniably a step in the right direction.’

Justice minister Lucy Frazer, said: ‘We are spending £1bn on transforming and modernising the justice system. Video hearings have the potential to improve access to justice and speed up cases.’

Issue: 7782 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll