header-logo header-logo

28 November 2018
Issue: 7819 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Fee rise for criminal advocates

The Lord Chancellor, David Gauke has pledged an extra £8m for the Advocates’ Graduated Fee Scheme (AGFS).

Speaking at the annual Bar Conference at the weekend, Gauke said the funds were in addition to the £15m promised in August for the fee scheme, bringing the total extra funds to £23m.

‘This extra money will be mostly targeted at cases conducted by junior advocates to support continued investment in the profession,’ he said.

‘We will also bring a proposed 1% increase to all fees forward so that the rise comes into effect alongside the planned introduction of the new scheme, rather than from April next year.’ He hinted at further increases, stating ‘there is scope to further improve the way criminal advocates are paid’.

Bar chair Andrew Walker QC welcomed the extra funding.

Issue: 7819 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll