header-logo header-logo

25 March 2010
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Female solicitors fear for promotion prospects

Negative perceptions affect women’s careers

Women solicitors fear their career prospects will suffer if they make use of family-friendly policies.

Half of 800 women solicitors surveyed believe lawyers who make use of such policies are viewed as less serious about their careers, and 44% believe working flexibly will have a negative impact on their promotion prospects.

The survey, by the Association of Women Solicitors (AWS) and King’s College, London, is one of the largest of its kind to date. It was carried out among partners, associates and assistants at practices ranging from large City law firms to high street firms.

Flexible working policies are being offered by an increasing number of law firms, including Clifford Chance, Linklaters, Norton Rose and Herbert Smith.
Allen & Overy LLP offers flexible working opportunities throughout its firm and recently introduced part-time working policies for full equity partners in a deliberate bid to retain more women—all partners will be able to work a minimum four-day week or be entitled to a maximum 52 days extra leave, for up to eight years.

Dr Clare McConnell, immediate past AWS chairwoman, says: “We would like to see a greater number of firms and organisations looking at the benefits that flexible working can bring. Even when you have flexible working policies in place, the implementation can be challenging. It is important that you get buy-in to the policies not just at the highest level but at each level of management, by the senior partner, departmental manager and office manager.”

The vast majority of women surveyed said they wanted careers that enabled them to integrate work with their family or personal lives. However, 41% worked in excess of 48 hours per week, with equity partners working the longest hours.

One third were dissatisfied with their opportunities to work flexibly. However, about 40% were currently working flexibly, with 28% working part-time or reduced hours.
 

Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll