header-logo header-logo

25 March 2010
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Female solicitors fear for promotion prospects

Negative perceptions affect women’s careers

Women solicitors fear their career prospects will suffer if they make use of family-friendly policies.

Half of 800 women solicitors surveyed believe lawyers who make use of such policies are viewed as less serious about their careers, and 44% believe working flexibly will have a negative impact on their promotion prospects.

The survey, by the Association of Women Solicitors (AWS) and King’s College, London, is one of the largest of its kind to date. It was carried out among partners, associates and assistants at practices ranging from large City law firms to high street firms.

Flexible working policies are being offered by an increasing number of law firms, including Clifford Chance, Linklaters, Norton Rose and Herbert Smith.
Allen & Overy LLP offers flexible working opportunities throughout its firm and recently introduced part-time working policies for full equity partners in a deliberate bid to retain more women—all partners will be able to work a minimum four-day week or be entitled to a maximum 52 days extra leave, for up to eight years.

Dr Clare McConnell, immediate past AWS chairwoman, says: “We would like to see a greater number of firms and organisations looking at the benefits that flexible working can bring. Even when you have flexible working policies in place, the implementation can be challenging. It is important that you get buy-in to the policies not just at the highest level but at each level of management, by the senior partner, departmental manager and office manager.”

The vast majority of women surveyed said they wanted careers that enabled them to integrate work with their family or personal lives. However, 41% worked in excess of 48 hours per week, with equity partners working the longest hours.

One third were dissatisfied with their opportunities to work flexibly. However, about 40% were currently working flexibly, with 28% working part-time or reduced hours.
 

Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll