header-logo header-logo

Female solicitors fear for promotion prospects

25 March 2010
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Negative perceptions affect women’s careers

Women solicitors fear their career prospects will suffer if they make use of family-friendly policies.

Half of 800 women solicitors surveyed believe lawyers who make use of such policies are viewed as less serious about their careers, and 44% believe working flexibly will have a negative impact on their promotion prospects.

The survey, by the Association of Women Solicitors (AWS) and King’s College, London, is one of the largest of its kind to date. It was carried out among partners, associates and assistants at practices ranging from large City law firms to high street firms.

Flexible working policies are being offered by an increasing number of law firms, including Clifford Chance, Linklaters, Norton Rose and Herbert Smith.
Allen & Overy LLP offers flexible working opportunities throughout its firm and recently introduced part-time working policies for full equity partners in a deliberate bid to retain more women—all partners will be able to work a minimum four-day week or be entitled to a maximum 52 days extra leave, for up to eight years.

Dr Clare McConnell, immediate past AWS chairwoman, says: “We would like to see a greater number of firms and organisations looking at the benefits that flexible working can bring. Even when you have flexible working policies in place, the implementation can be challenging. It is important that you get buy-in to the policies not just at the highest level but at each level of management, by the senior partner, departmental manager and office manager.”

The vast majority of women surveyed said they wanted careers that enabled them to integrate work with their family or personal lives. However, 41% worked in excess of 48 hours per week, with equity partners working the longest hours.

One third were dissatisfied with their opportunities to work flexibly. However, about 40% were currently working flexibly, with 28% working part-time or reduced hours.
 

Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll