header-logo header-logo

25 March 2010
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Female solicitors fear for promotion prospects

Negative perceptions affect women’s careers

Women solicitors fear their career prospects will suffer if they make use of family-friendly policies.

Half of 800 women solicitors surveyed believe lawyers who make use of such policies are viewed as less serious about their careers, and 44% believe working flexibly will have a negative impact on their promotion prospects.

The survey, by the Association of Women Solicitors (AWS) and King’s College, London, is one of the largest of its kind to date. It was carried out among partners, associates and assistants at practices ranging from large City law firms to high street firms.

Flexible working policies are being offered by an increasing number of law firms, including Clifford Chance, Linklaters, Norton Rose and Herbert Smith.
Allen & Overy LLP offers flexible working opportunities throughout its firm and recently introduced part-time working policies for full equity partners in a deliberate bid to retain more women—all partners will be able to work a minimum four-day week or be entitled to a maximum 52 days extra leave, for up to eight years.

Dr Clare McConnell, immediate past AWS chairwoman, says: “We would like to see a greater number of firms and organisations looking at the benefits that flexible working can bring. Even when you have flexible working policies in place, the implementation can be challenging. It is important that you get buy-in to the policies not just at the highest level but at each level of management, by the senior partner, departmental manager and office manager.”

The vast majority of women surveyed said they wanted careers that enabled them to integrate work with their family or personal lives. However, 41% worked in excess of 48 hours per week, with equity partners working the longest hours.

One third were dissatisfied with their opportunities to work flexibly. However, about 40% were currently working flexibly, with 28% working part-time or reduced hours.
 

Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll