header-logo header-logo

FIFA quotas ruled offside?

17 July 2008 / Richard Williams , Alex Haffner
Issue: 7330 / Categories: Features , Public , EU
printer mail-detail

Is FIFA's proposal to introduce a quota on foreign nationals in club football legal? Richard Williams and Alex Haffner report

Now that the UEFA European Football Championship is over, the spotlight has turned away from the pitch and back towards the controversial proposal of the world football governing body, FIFA, to introduce a quota on foreign nationals playing in domestic competitions. Dubbed the “6+5” rule as it prevents a club fielding more than five players who are not eligible for the national team of that country in their starting eleven, the plan has gained widespread press attention and international interest. Led by FIFA President Sepp Blatter, it has found support from a number of influential figures, but it has also been condemned as unnecessary and incompatible with European legislation, not least by the European Commission (the Commission). With Blatter seemingly on a personal crusade to have it introduced, and now officially backed by FIFA, this issue looks like it will run and run.

The European football governing body, UEFA, has already

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll