header-logo header-logo

17 July 2008 / Richard Williams , Alex Haffner
Issue: 7330 / Categories: Features , Public , EU
printer mail-detail

FIFA quotas ruled offside?

Is FIFA's proposal to introduce a quota on foreign nationals in club football legal? Richard Williams and Alex Haffner report

Now that the UEFA European Football Championship is over, the spotlight has turned away from the pitch and back towards the controversial proposal of the world football governing body, FIFA, to introduce a quota on foreign nationals playing in domestic competitions. Dubbed the “6+5” rule as it prevents a club fielding more than five players who are not eligible for the national team of that country in their starting eleven, the plan has gained widespread press attention and international interest. Led by FIFA President Sepp Blatter, it has found support from a number of influential figures, but it has also been condemned as unnecessary and incompatible with European legislation, not least by the European Commission (the Commission). With Blatter seemingly on a personal crusade to have it introduced, and now officially backed by FIFA, this issue looks like it will run and run.

The European football governing body, UEFA, has already

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll