header-logo header-logo

13 April 2007
Issue: 7268 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Fight over unified contracts to continue

A Law Society plan to obtain a last-minute injunction to stay introduction of the unified legal aid contract has been dropped after counsel advised there were no grounds for such an application.

The society has now pledged to continue to concentrate on its judicial review application which aims to remove the Legal Service Commission’s (LSC’s) unilateral right to amend the contract.

Although 95% of law firms and 98% of not-for-profit agencies had signed the unified legal aid contract by the extended 2 April deadline, the society insists that solicitors will continue to fight the destruction of legal aid.

In a statement it says: “It remains to be seen how the LSC will repair the immense damage to its relationships with suppliers. The LSC’s high dependency on the dedication of legal aid firms makes it imperative that it starts listening to their concerns.”
However, LSC chief executive Carolyn Regan says the high level of firms signing up for the contract means clients can be confident of continued access to civil legal aid services.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll