header-logo header-logo

Fight over unified contracts to continue

13 April 2007
Issue: 7268 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

A Law Society plan to obtain a last-minute injunction to stay introduction of the unified legal aid contract has been dropped after counsel advised there were no grounds for such an application.

The society has now pledged to continue to concentrate on its judicial review application which aims to remove the Legal Service Commission’s (LSC’s) unilateral right to amend the contract.

Although 95% of law firms and 98% of not-for-profit agencies had signed the unified legal aid contract by the extended 2 April deadline, the society insists that solicitors will continue to fight the destruction of legal aid.

In a statement it says: “It remains to be seen how the LSC will repair the immense damage to its relationships with suppliers. The LSC’s high dependency on the dedication of legal aid firms makes it imperative that it starts listening to their concerns.”
However, LSC chief executive Carolyn Regan says the high level of firms signing up for the contract means clients can be confident of continued access to civil legal aid services.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll