header-logo header-logo

Fightback against scams

05 April 2012
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Rip-off traders & scam merchants targeted by Law Commissions

Consumers would be given extra protection against rip-off traders and scam merchants, under legal reforms proposed by the Law Commission and Scottish Law Commission.

The commissioners’ report, Consumer Redress for Misleading and Aggressive Practices, published last week, recommends a new legal right of redress against traders that carry out misleading or aggressive practices. Consumers would be entitled to a refund or a discount on the price, and damages could be available if the unfair practice caused additional loss. The new law would also cover situations where companies aggressively harass consumers for payment, where remedies would include refund or damages for distress.

Law Commissioner David Hertzell says: “By simplifying the law, our recommended reforms will give more confidence to consumers and help drive rogue traders out of the market place, where currently they damage the reputation and livelihood of good, honest businesses.”

Citizens Advice chief executive Gillian Guy says: “The law has neglected to recognise that people should get their money back when they have been subjected to pressure selling.

“Complex laws on misrepresentation have also failed consumers who have been blatantly misled by sales people. We need a simple consumer law to help consumers get a refund or compensation in these cases so that shoppers aren’t left with a sting in their pocket, and we need it fast.”

Issue: 7509 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll