header-logo header-logo

Fighting exclusion

01 November 2018 / Olivia Wybraniec
Issue: 7815 / Categories: Features , Discrimination
printer mail-detail
nlj_7815_wybraniec

It’s time for schools to reflect on the discriminatory nature of excluding children with special educational needs, says Olivia Wybraniec

  • The appellants had been preventing from bringing a claim for disability discrimination against their autistic son’s school after he was excluded for aggressive behaviour.
  • The Upper Tribunal was asked to review the exception to protection from discrimination where there was a tendency to physical violence, on Convention grounds.
  • The Upper Tribunal upheld the appeal, finding the Regulations failed to balance the rights of children with special educational needs and violated their Convention right to education without discrimination.

It is a difficult reality that some children with special educational needs face school exclusions due to behaviour which is a manifestation of those very needs. Even more problematic is that those children may previously have been prevented from bringing disability discrimination claims under the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) because of an exclusion from the EqA 2010 for cases involving physical violence. The appellant parents in C & C v The Governing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll