header-logo header-logo

11 November 2011 / Professor Dominic Regan
Issue: 7489 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Figure it out

Dominic Regan sails into the latest developments on costs in Trafigura

It was certain that Trafigura would end up in the Court of Appeal having regards to the level of costs claimed. We now have the comprehensive judgment of the court: Motto and others v Trafigura Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1150, [2011] All ER (D) 138 (Oct).

Large bill

With a gift for the understatement, the master of the rolls suggested that the defendant was “dismayed” to receive a bill for £104,707,772. The litigation arose out of an incident in August 2006, when the defendant discharged toxic materials from a ship in Africa. Ultimately, 29,614 claimants came forward. Despite allegations of dire injury and damage it transpired that the victims had sustained mild flu-like symptoms. A settlement package of £30m was eventually agreed.

Influence of early admission

There are many important lessons for all litigators in this case. The first and foremost is that it is wise for a defendant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll