header-logo header-logo

11 November 2011 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7489 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Figure it out

Dominic Regan sails into the latest developments on costs in Trafigura

It was certain that Trafigura would end up in the Court of Appeal having regards to the level of costs claimed. We now have the comprehensive judgment of the court: Motto and others v Trafigura Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1150, [2011] All ER (D) 138 (Oct).

Large bill

With a gift for the understatement, the master of the rolls suggested that the defendant was “dismayed” to receive a bill for £104,707,772. The litigation arose out of an incident in August 2006, when the defendant discharged toxic materials from a ship in Africa. Ultimately, 29,614 claimants came forward. Despite allegations of dire injury and damage it transpired that the victims had sustained mild flu-like symptoms. A settlement package of £30m was eventually agreed.

Influence of early admission

There are many important lessons for all litigators in this case. The first and foremost is that it is wise for a defendant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll