header-logo header-logo

Figure it out

11 November 2011 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7489 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan sails into the latest developments on costs in Trafigura

It was certain that Trafigura would end up in the Court of Appeal having regards to the level of costs claimed. We now have the comprehensive judgment of the court: Motto and others v Trafigura Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1150, [2011] All ER (D) 138 (Oct).

Large bill

With a gift for the understatement, the master of the rolls suggested that the defendant was “dismayed” to receive a bill for £104,707,772. The litigation arose out of an incident in August 2006, when the defendant discharged toxic materials from a ship in Africa. Ultimately, 29,614 claimants came forward. Despite allegations of dire injury and damage it transpired that the victims had sustained mild flu-like symptoms. A settlement package of £30m was eventually agreed.

Influence of early admission

There are many important lessons for all litigators in this case. The first and foremost is that it is wise for a defendant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll