header-logo header-logo

Finally…no-fault divorce

08 April 2022
Issue: 7974 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Profession , Divorce
printer mail-detail
Family lawyers have hailed the new era of fault-free divorce, which takes effect this week after decades of campaigning

The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 removes the need to prove marriage breakdown by the fact of adultery or unreasonable behaviour or require the couple to have lived apart for two or five years. This is ‘an important change in the law, and a significant change in the language that will now be used, which will be invaluable in changing the public perception of one party having to be to blame for the breakdown of the relationship’, said Simon Donald, partner at Cripps Pemberton Greenish.

Graham Coy, head of family at Wilsons Solicitors, anticipated some people might ignore the mediator’s advice to consult a lawyer and end up not seeking legal advice until their divorce was at an advanced stage. He also predicted ‘a trend in simple cases becoming unnecessarily complicated’ where people ran into problems after attempting to ‘navigate the legal landscape without legal advice’.

Family lawyers have reported clients choosing to wait for the ‘no-fault’ option to become available. Zoe Porter, partner at Ashfords said she expects ‘a surge in applications’ but also some delays. 

‘With so much of the country suffering the effects of COVID, most sectors are experiencing staff shortages and the court system is no different,’ she said. 

‘We are already experiencing long delays in the process of applications (and the listing of hearings depending on where in the country you are based) and I can see this continuing for the foreseeable future.’

Research by law firm Fladgate shows one in two divorcees would have plumped for a no-fault divorce had it been an option at the time (70% of men and 40% of women).

More than one quarter (28%) believed fault-free divorce would have made their split less acrimonious.

Fladgate partner Hetty Gleave said: ‘It is anticipated that this will help to ease up the pressure placed on the already stretched court system in England and Wales, who will be freed from entering into the quagmire of marital “he said/she said” and attributing blame for the breakdown of marriages.’

Issue: 7974 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Profession , Divorce
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll